From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/7947 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: MIME w/ Xemacs Date: 19 Sep 1996 12:58:44 -0700 Sender: steve@miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.85) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148188 9254 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:09:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:09:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA07000 for ; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 13:15:46 -0700 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@deanna.miranova.com [206.190.83.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 21:55:06 +0200 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.6/8.6.9) id MAA06594; Thu, 19 Sep 1996 12:58:45 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ In-Reply-To: Erik Selberg's message of 18 Sep 1996 12:39:46 -0700 Original-Lines: 15 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.35/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7947 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:7947 >>>>> "Erik" == Erik Selberg writes: Erik> I've been playing about with XEmacs trying to get inline MIME to Erik> work (e.g. MIME pictures are part of the buffer, not in a Erik> separate XV window) with no success. Has anyone else been able Erik> to get this to work? I've been playing with tm7.85. Inline MIME images have worked for a long time. Are you loading mime-setup properly? -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. What are the last two letters of "doesn't" and "can't"? Coincidence? I think not.