From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/86597 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Alan Schmitt Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: a bug with gnus-summary-refer-article? Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:00:21 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1452585675 11240 80.91.229.3 (12 Jan 2016 08:01:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 08:01:15 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M34824@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Jan 12 09:01:03 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aItt0-000319-KP for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:01:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aItsU-0001BI-TG; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:00:30 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aItsS-0001Ap-N9 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:00:28 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1aItsQ-0008RL-Ot for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 02:00:28 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.polytechnique.org ([129.104.30.34]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1aItsN-0000W3-Rn for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:00:23 +0100 Original-Received: from charm-ecran.irisa.fr (charm-ecran.irisa.fr [131.254.101.83]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ssl.polytechnique.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3609B56479F for ; Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:00:22 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (Alan Schmitt's message of "Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:21:55 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) X-AV-Checked: ClamAV using ClamSMTP at svoboda.polytechnique.org (Tue Jan 12 09:00:22 2016 +0100 (CET)) X-Spam-Flag: No, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000653, queueID=705845647A0 X-Org-Mail: alan.schmitt.1995@polytechnique.org X-Spam-Score: -4.9 (----) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:86597 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, I reported this as a bug. Here is the link: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D22353 Alan On 2016-01-10 22:21, Alan Schmitt writes: > Hello, > > I think I found a bug with `gnus-summary-refer-article'. If I fetch an > article that comes from another group, it gets inserted in the summary > with a number of -1. During the call to `gnus-summary-mark-article', the > following is done > > (setq mark (gnus-request-update-mark gnus-newsgroup-name article mark)) > > which results in mark being nil. This in turn makes the comparisons such > as > > (=3D mark gnus-unread-mark) > > fail with a "Wrong type argument: number-or-marker-p, nil". > > Here is a trimmed-down backtrace: > > Debugger entered--Lisp error: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) > =3D(nil 32) > ... > gnus-summary-mark-article(-1 82) > gnus-summary-mark-read-and-unread-as-read() > run-hooks(gnus-mark-article-hook) > apply(run-hooks gnus-mark-article-hook) > gnus-run-hooks(gnus-mark-article-hook) > gnus-article-prepare(-1 nil) > gnus-summary-display-article(-1 nil) > gnus-summary-select-article(nil nil nil -1) > (progn (gnus-summary-select-article nil nil nil number) (throw (quote f= ound) t)) > ... > gnus-summary-refer-article("52947012.308@cse.gu.se") > call-interactively(gnus-summary-refer-article nil nil) > command-execute(gnus-summary-refer-article) > > Is this a known bug? > > Thanks, > > Alan =2D-=20 OpenPGP Key ID : 040D0A3B4ED2E5C7 Athmospheric CO=E2=82=82 (Updated January 10, 2016, Mauna Loa Obs.): 402.22= ppm --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJWlLKVAAoJEAQNCjtO0uXHonMH/27HdUWq6GcsMoahLxSQnr5A afA2sHdccRmw/zMyxD2iNma55CiZZ/Qq6rV+ak3ER410ocYjbo14XSZc9ieei06S EQ+Ja3yskxlWgmJu6P0hJjc7knLSHQ05EE9D3yzrmuszMimRAsBL0AF5vrtDb/7k xjvY5C81/fiCYmYKmKm5+hgJPK3jM6SwuAfnti59P3LiPqi1Ja059lLWroGXOJEC t5/5ZgENAWa55wWtepW4vVuDcEddbKCu5yZ066Fe037WdIZ41p7hpG35PQSBSWuc xuS5T1xNqu2a4vff9u+BV11x+dFVINe56BcQqAcvDeoP1Es0ckZKB/iMPqexlMk= =mDKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--