From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8592
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: writable NNTP server -- the saga continues
Date: 05 Nov 1996 03:31:53 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.eyesore.no
Message-ID: <m2918h46hy.fsf@proletcult.eyesore.no>
References: <vafybgh7vgi.fsf@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148736 13067 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:18:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:18:56 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 3799 invoked from smtpd); 5 Nov 1996 05:35:04 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 5 Nov 1996 05:35:03 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult (root@ppp14.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.114]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <GAA26616@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 06:18:50 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA03996; Tue, 5 Nov 1996 03:32:55 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of 04 Nov 1996 16:04:29 +0100
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.54/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8592
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8592

Kai Grossjohann <grossjohann@ls6.informatik.uni-dortmund.de> writes:

> To clarify: let's say I move 5 articles from group A to group B.  Then
> Gnus will tell me that it's moving all these articles, and it will
> also tell me for each article that it's deleting them (as it should).
> The NNTP server log tells me that there has been an XDELETE command
> for each article, all of which were completed successfully.  Also, the
> nnmk-request-expire-articles function returns nil (no articles were
> not deleted -- this _is_ the meaning of the return value of
> *-request-expire-articles, isn't it?).

Yes, but that's not the function that's called when moving articles.
`nnmk-request-move-article' is the one that's called, and it should
return a `(group . article)' cons cell that says what the group name
and article number the article was moved to.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen