From: steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur)
Cc: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch
Subject: What Gnus version for XEmacs 19.14?
Date: 30 Nov 1995 13:13:23 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m291kxn6vg.fsf_-_@diana.miranova.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: vroonhof@math.ethz.ch's message of 30 Nov 1995 10:12:59 -0800
>>>>> "jan" == vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:
jan> Dear Lars and ding list readers (Note that I only
jan> occasionally browse the list)
>>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
Per> 5.0.12 is the release at Lars' site. Emacs 19.30 will have
Per> 5.1. I'm more curious about what will be in XEmacs 19.14.
Per> It might be a good idea to make an unbundled 5.1.1 release
Per> after Emacs 19.30 has been released.
jan> Now that 19.30 is out. I am even more for such an unbundled
jan> release. I want the bug fixes in 5.1 without getting the
jan> whole 19.30 distribution. At the moment I don't want to ask
jan> our sysadmin people to upgrade our 19.28, because it is
jan> difficult enough even to get them to do more urgent things.
jan> Besides, I discovered enough discspace to install my own
jan> (self maintained) copy of XEmacs 19.13 and really am thinking
jan> of switching now. So having an up to date copy of a stable
jan> gnus with XEmacs support would be nice.
jan> I consider it a mistake to ship packages that don't support
jan> XE with E and vice versa, because it makes library sharing
jan> betweem them unnecesairily difficult for some small savings
jan> in discspace.
jan> Enyoing GNUS very much, thank you,
What version to put with XEmacs 19.14? I've been wondering about this
one too. The problem with 5.0.12 is that it has a lot of bugs in it,
and I would rate the stability of the latest September Gnus (v0.16) to
be superior at this time (considering the basic/older features and
XEmacs only).
Given also that the internal .newsrc format has changed, and older
versions are ``poison'', I never bothered to even start 5.1 -- I
installed September when I installed Emacs 19.30.
One possibility is to phase it in, like they did with mailcrypt in the
19.13 release. Leave old GNUS as the default, but include the latest
version of September Gnus for those who wish to try it. By the time
19.15 is ready, September Gnus should be 5.2 and solid (my unofficial
guess).
jan> Jan
jan> P.S. Where did the versionnumber in the (nice) startup screen
jan> go?
There was a discussion on this list about this in mid-September. See
the hypermail archive <URL: http://www.miranova.com/gnus-list/Sep-1995/>
and the thread ``Guess this is a faq.. How to post to foreign groups?''
for the gory details. In short, you only see version numbers when *not*
running an officially bundled Gnus.
Regards,
--
steve@miranova.com baur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-11-30 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-11-15 20:42 September Gnus 0.13 is released Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-11-15 22:13 ` Paul J. Sanchez
1995-11-15 22:16 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-11-16 4:44 ` Robert Nicholson
1995-11-16 5:51 ` Sudish Joseph
1995-11-16 15:31 ` Edward J. Sabol
1995-11-17 0:48 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-11-17 12:18 ` Greg Stark
1995-11-19 7:43 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1996-01-15 8:44 ` Greg Stark
1995-11-17 15:50 ` Edward J. Sabol
1995-11-16 14:39 ` Per Abrahamsen
1995-11-16 15:27 ` Paul D. Smith
1995-11-16 19:57 ` Stefan Monnier
1995-11-30 18:12 ` vroonhof
1995-11-30 21:13 ` Steven L. Baur [this message]
1995-12-01 3:57 ` What Gnus version for XEmacs 19.14? Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-12-01 3:57 ` September Gnus 0.13 is released Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-11-16 12:44 ` Stefan Bodewig
1995-11-16 15:22 ` Stefan Bodewig
1995-11-16 17:55 ` Steven L. Baur
1995-11-16 18:21 ` Steven L. Baur
1995-11-17 1:08 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
1995-11-16 20:55 ` Shane Holder
1995-11-16 22:33 ` Steven L. Baur
1995-11-17 1:14 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m291kxn6vg.fsf_-_@diana.miranova.com \
--to=steve@miranova.com \
--cc=vroonhof@math.ethz.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).