From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12748 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: SL Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Digest bursting Date: 01 Nov 1997 19:44:26 -0800 Message-ID: References: <862010t463.fsf@wmperry.oz.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152229 5454 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:17:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:17:09 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA06361 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 20:59:23 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA26541 for ; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 23:00:25 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.7/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with SMTP id EAA08621 for ; Sun, 2 Nov 1997 04:45:52 +0100 (MET) Original-Received: (qmail 4549 invoked by uid 504); 2 Nov 1997 03:45:51 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 4546 invoked from network); 2 Nov 1997 03:45:51 -0000 Original-Received: from xemacs.miranova.com (HELO altair.xemacs.org) (steve@206.190.83.19) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 2 Nov 1997 03:45:51 -0000 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA05340; Sat, 1 Nov 1997 19:44:26 -0800 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: (:YAD@JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$ ,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3 Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l writes: > Hrvoje Niksic writes: >> Will Gnus support digest bursting in the future? Does anyone else >> think it might be useful? > You should be able to hit 'C-d' in the summary buffer and be put into the > equivalent of a 'virtual folder' in VM-speak. Then you can select the > articles and Br (respool) them to 'nnml'. As far as I know, that code has always worked pretty good. If you use procmail, you can have it burst digests for you. Here's a couple of recipes I've been using for some time now: # Risks Digest :0 * ^Return-Path:.*((owner-)?risks(-owner)?|risko)@ * ^Subject:[ ]*RISKS DIGEST { :0c: risks-digest.spool # Split the digest, since digests suck :0f:risks.spool.lock | formail -ds >> risks.spool :0 /dev/null } # cola via email :0 * ^(Sender|Return-Path):.*owner-[lL]inux-[Aa]nnounce@ { :0c: lnx-announce-digest.spool # Now attempt splitting the digest :0f:linux-announce.spool.lock | formail -ds >> linux-announce.spool :0 /dev/null }