From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12288 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: NoCeM types Date: 23 Sep 1997 01:35:39 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151850 2955 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:10:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:10:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA16835 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 18:11:16 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA13937 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 19:52:08 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 01:59:38 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 12876 invoked by uid 504); 22 Sep 1997 23:59:37 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 12868 invoked from network); 22 Sep 1997 23:59:36 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 1997 23:59:36 -0000 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (larsi@xyplex10.uio.no [129.240.154.30]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 01:59:33 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id CAA32480; Tue, 23 Sep 1997 02:02:34 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of "22 Sep 1997 00:01:36 -0400" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.10/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > how should the user specify that she wants "everything but message > > type X" from despammer Y? > > Something like nnmail-split-fancy would work very nicely. Ie., a > recursive structure with a regexp applied to the header-name portion > of the NoCeM header used as a selector. It sounds like overkill to me. I think the elements in `gnus-nocem-issuers' should be expanded to include lists. The first element in these lists is the despammer name, and then would follow a list of type specs. For instance: ("clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca" ".*" (not "troll")) matches all types except "troll"; ("clewis@ferret.ocunix.on.ca" (not ".*") "spew" "spam") matches nothing but "spew" and "spam". The specs are applied left-to-right. Whaddayouthink? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen