From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8799
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Discussion: To del cached articles upon zapping group info?
Date: 15 Nov 1996 22:53:42 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2afsjc9eh.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no>
References: <199611131650.LAA17750@alderaan.gsfc.nasa.gov> <rvd8xh3lfh.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <m2zq0lrqxr.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <rjybg5gh7n.fsf@babbage.dina.kvl.dk> <qk2hgms3iqa.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148915 14416 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:21:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:21:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 9497 invoked from smtpd); 15 Nov 1996 22:54:33 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 15 Nov 1996 22:54:32 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp14.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.114]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <XAA14056@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 23:28:36 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id WAA09284; Fri, 15 Nov 1996 22:53:51 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch's message of 14 Nov 1996 14:32:29 +0100
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.63/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8799
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8799

Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch writes:

> I think gnus *has* to do at least a move to get them out of the way so
> it doesn't screw up in the first place, and it should at the very
> least warn the user as well.  Preferably, with a prompt as a simple
> message can disappear without the user actually ever seeing it whereas
> a prompt will sit around till the specifically acknowledge it...

I've now added this to `gnus-group-clear-data-on-native-groups' in
0.63. 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen