From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/75192 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francis Moreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Sending patch with Gnus Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:14:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871v5i212s.fsf@tux.homenetwork> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1292573699 31698 80.91.229.12 (17 Dec 2010 08:14:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: Rupert Swarbrick Original-X-From: ding-owner+M23547@lists.math.uh.edu Fri Dec 17 09:14:55 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVSp-0003fp-04 for ding-account@gmane.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:14:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVSf-0001qL-83; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:14:45 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVSd-0001q7-Ga for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:14:43 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVSa-0004h6-1v for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 02:14:41 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTVSZ-0005Qq-7z for ding@gnus.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:14:39 +0100 Original-Received: by wwd20 with SMTP id 20so364488wwd.5 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:14:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=FMm5ey4sV8hn30/srE7bOZVcA1LKYcniwRacOHnT3dQ=; b=PWfba+VyJ5tmCXrrrgxGqPZuht/B5s39KX08TlhF3PpG1A8s1Mx4ElJWBdJLb/c5Ss 65khFQ+jIQttGclQHzevodld+faq6UjDNuoUzGChPOSYogvsw4S+fdxluXxmiqNi4uc9 0q/Kwx76+OW0mrnyNYKhcAXgQOIqnMVV5jiU4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=hJ3vXQggE+P6C0T+xPp+4h9Ij1FvidPMZ5y2JiKzzLp1Zro1cZXln2yQlV2QuqVtLe r7aR7eWENO7P5ybg16vvAhENre1cKY7lT2BbEByqtKztN4+bCWXvaqAi+/TOXY/I5UMq Mzy8sHdiH64foIeD0gyGHmogy9ezgZ1qkCcWo= Original-Received: by 10.216.154.83 with SMTP id g61mr766602wek.87.1292573673622; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:14:33 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (au213-1-82-235-205-153.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.205.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a2sm1098wer.17.2010.12.17.00.14.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:14:32 -0800 (PST) Mail-Followup-To: Rupert Swarbrick , ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Rupert Swarbrick's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:02:43 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -3.0 (---) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:75192 Archived-At: Rupert Swarbrick writes: > Francis Moreau writes: >>> More sadly still (and possibly this is me being stupid?), if you >>> realise something looks rubbish, the obvious approach of C-k killing >>> the group, editing the mbox file and then doing G f again doesn't >>> work, because Gnus cleverly caches the emails it seems (when I changed >>> the number of emails I was getting the wrong ones!). >> >> I don't think that's correct. If something need to be corrected, you >> shouldn't modify the mbox file but instead fix your patchset inside your >> repo and then regenerate the mbox file. > > Sorry, I wasn't clear. I meant that the text in the cover letter bit > (patch 0/n) might have mistakes that one needs to fix which, unless I've > misunderstood something, you have to do after calling "git > format-patch". Ok, so I misunderstood and we agree. -- Francis