From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9402 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [a] emphasis intelligence; [b] URLs -vs- smileys Date: 15 Jan 1997 01:51:30 +0100 Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149435 18258 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:35 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id RAA21492 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 1997 17:27:44 -0800 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp12.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.112]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 02:14:33 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id BAA18325; Wed, 15 Jan 1997 01:51:31 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Karl Kleinpaste's message of 12 Jan 1997 08:28:24 -0500 Original-Lines: 32 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.81/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > [a] I've noticed that emphasization is a little too dumb regarding > (especially) end-of-phrase punctuation. That is, > *This is boldface*. > but > *This is not.* Yup. Fix in Red Gnus v0.81. > [b] Another display mis-twiddle, brought to mind by seeing Brad > Templeton arguing about URL parsing in message bodies, is that > PATH=/usr/lib/news:/bin > displays as (for those of you not using smileys, and pardon the > pseudo-HTML) > PATH=/usr/lib/newsbin > Is it possible to make recognition of URLs avoid preceding > non-whitespace? And for genuine URLs, can smilification be > priority-downgraded so as not to interrupt a URL (perhaps based on > there being boldface text already present)? Hm... Yes, but you'd have to be careful not to not not smilify things that just happen to be bold for some highlighting purpose or other. > (For that matter, can this mis-display be avoided? > Hey, bub, let me give you some news: Yup. Fix in Red Gnus v0.81. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen