From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76998 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bug#8070: gnus damages attached file Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:49 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871v34nwdn.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87aahss3yu.fsf@gnus.org> <87hbbz6fg4.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87vd0fpvzv.fsf@gnus.org> <874o7z662d.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87d3mnk1sy.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87ipwfo6as.fsf@gnus.org> <87pqqndppl.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87ei73dlvx.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <874o7yeszz.fsf@myhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298209344 9563 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2011 13:42:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 13:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bugs@gnus.org, ding@gnus.org To: Hobbit Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25331@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 20 14:42:20 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr9YJ-0005sY-7J for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:42:19 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr9Y1-0001YM-Pp; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:42:01 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr9Xz-0001Y5-Lr for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:41:59 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr9Xy-0002jU-3t for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 07:41:59 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr9Xw-0003vb-L3; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:56 +0100 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469891C1D9F5; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D32A01C00142; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:50 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Pi729Etx0FXX; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-109-210.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.109.210]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:50 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id EE9F5CA2A0; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 14:41:49 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I've gotta GO, now!! I wanta tell you you're a GREAT bunch of guys but you ought to CHANGE your UNDERWEAR more often!! In-Reply-To: <874o7yeszz.fsf@myhost.localdomain> (Hobbit's message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2011 15:27:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.94 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1707--4217h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1640--4051h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1583--3911h-0s--0d--H*u:linux, 0.000-1583--3911h-0s--0d--H*UA:linux, 0.000-1526--3771h-0s--0d--H*UA:gnu Spam tokens: 0.999-257--2h-3156s--0d--H*Ad:U*bugs, 0.993-1--0h-2s--0d--hobbit, 0.993-1--0h-2s--0d--D*yandex.ru, 0.987-1--0h-1s--4d--H*RU:sk:mail.m-, 0.987-1--0h-1s--4d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:sk:mail.m- Autolearn status: no -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.18.0.9 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.3 FSL_RU_URL URI: FSL_RU_URL -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76998 Archived-At: Hobbit writes: > I can't know charset of everything. If somebody ask me to send him some > cryptic text file (for example, generated by an old local program with > it's own unique charset), I don't want to guess what codepage it > has. Asked. Sent. Finished. If you send an arbitrary byte stream you send it as application/octet-stream. Case closed. > Well, in a such cases I usually write about codepage in a message > text. What's wrong with putting it in the charset declaration? > I enclose two reports about that (from aforementioned thread): All I can see in the second attachment are two basically equivalent files, one encoded in UTF-8 and one encoded in Latin-1. The third attachment is missing vital information, so I cannot say anything about it. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."