From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8689 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Nnml groups, the to-group parameter, and following up to a crosspost Date: 08 Nov 1996 22:33:33 -0800 Sender: steve@deanna.miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148820 13775 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:20:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:20:20 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 7345 invoked from smtpd); 9 Nov 1996 06:43:09 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 1996 06:43:08 -0000 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (qmailr@deanna.miranova.com [206.190.83.1]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 07:31:05 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 7243 invoked by uid 501); 9 Nov 1996 06:33:36 -0000 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 09 Nov 1996 05:57:14 +0100 Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.56/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8689 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8689 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> Yes. But I still think that `to-group' should be allowed to Lars> specify a single group to send an article to, no matter whether Lars> there is a Newsgroups header in the article or not. Lars> How about introducing a new group parameter -- `newsgroup'? If Lars> it is t, then Gnus will use normal news methods for responding Lars> to the message? Either that, or for symmetry with to-list and to-address you could add a to-usenet parameter that takes a home group parameter, but otherwise follows Newsgroups: if present. How would (newsgroup . t) behave in the presence of to-list and to-address parameters? It would still (cross)post to Usenet if there were a Newsgroups: header, otherwise Newsgroups: would be ignored on Followup, right? That sounds useful, maybe you could do both. I notice on some mailing lists there are crossposts between pseudo newsgroups and real newsgroups (like mail.cypherpunks and sci.crypt) that would be nice to have treated correctly. -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. What are the last two letters of "doesn't" and "can't"? Coincidence? I think not.