From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8417
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: rgnus 0.[49-52] and XEmacs ?
Date: 17 Oct 1996 09:05:24 -0700
Sender: steve@deanna.miranova.com
Message-ID: <m2d8yho9tn.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
References: <x2ramxvezd.fsf@lemming5.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de> <rhsg23dk4mo.fsf@internex.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.90)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148580 12034 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:16:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:16:20 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 12465 invoked from smtpd); 17 Oct 1996 16:17:04 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 17 Oct 1996 16:17:03 -0000
Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (qmailr@deanna.miranova.com [206.190.83.1]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <SAA03368@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 17 Oct 1996 18:02:35 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 12304 invoked by uid 501); 17 Oct 1996 16:05:25 -0000
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5"
 f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccq<xoV[Qz2u8<8-+Vwf2gzJ44lf_/y9OaQ`@#Q65{U4/TC)i2`~/M&QI$X>p:9I
 OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+
In-Reply-To: Sean Lynch's message of 17 Oct 1996 08:11:11 -0700
Original-Lines: 28
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.47/XEmacs 19.15
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8417
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8417

>>>>> "Sean" == Sean Lynch <seanl@Internex.NET> writes:
>>>>> someone posing as Jens Lautenbacher <jens@lemming5.lem.uni-karlsruhe.de> wrote:

 [Red Gnus >v0.48 loses on XEmacs]

Jens> Any clues?

Jens> By the way, I'm using tm7.81 if this is of any help... I have
Jens> heard there are some problems with tm and newer rgnus, though I
Jens> can't think of any problems to appear at least with topic mode.

There's a patch available (and it's fixed in tm7.90).  The Red Gnus
detection code broke when a symbol disappeared.

Sean> I have exactly the same problem.  I added the following hack to my
Sean> .gnus.el to fix it:

Sean> ;; Temporary hack for problem with rgnus-0.50
Sean> (add-hook 'gnus-startup-hook 'gnus-xmas-define)

That sounds about right.  The Group buffer looks like the bad old
days before Lars fixed the extent boundaries code.

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.
What are the last two letters of "doesn't" and "can't"?
Coincidence?  I think not.