From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6303 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is it 5.2 time yet? Date: 21 May 1996 09:42:01 -0700 Sender: steve@miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.62) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146779 3246 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:46:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:46:19 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA22096 for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 10:23:50 -0700 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@miranova.com [204.212.162.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 21 May 1996 18:42:26 +0200 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id JAA20788; Tue, 21 May 1996 09:42:02 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 19 May 1996 11:32:58 -0700 Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.89/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6303 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6303 >>>>> "Lars" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: Lars> Steven L Baur writes: >> I've got 2 new bugs and 1 old bug on my list right now: >> 1. I was able to create a situation where moving topics (with T m) >> did not remove them from the source topic, though the display >> indicated that they had been moved. Lars> I've tried some `T m'ing, and things seemed to work ok for me. Was Lars> this with 0.89? This sort of thing could actually be the result of Lars> XEmacs text prop bleeds before The Grand Discovery Of Start-Open. I just tried this again and it still failed. What I did was select all the remaining groups in the ``Gnus'' topic and attempt to move them to a (sub)topic. Instead of moving, the groups now appear twice (I don't have the unique topic option set). Is the ``Gnus'' topic renameable? I'd prefer to use that topic name for groups uniquely dedicated to Gnus. -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour. Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone except you in November.