From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/68275 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Engster Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: (file-error "writing to process" "bad address" #) when Gcc-ing a group Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:38:10 +0100 Message-ID: References: <873aenr2gk.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87tz73plyd.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87ab8v7651.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87y6wf43fr.fsf@randomsample.de> <87fxim8wi9.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87y6we71pg.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1234280322 26280 80.91.229.12 (10 Feb 2009 15:38:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:38:42 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M16715@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Feb 10 16:39:58 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LWuiH-0004z2-DD for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:39:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWugn-0002PO-Jt; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:38:21 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWugm-0002P9-CL for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:38:20 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1LWugj-0006i4-Bz for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:38:20 -0600 Original-Received: from m61s02.vlinux.de ([83.151.21.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1LWuh3-00018V-00 for ; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:38:37 +0100 Original-Received: from [134.76.4.218] (helo=Macintosh.local) by m61s02.vlinux.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1LWuiE-0007pR-R5 for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:39:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87y6we71pg.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:26:19 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.90 (darwin) Mail-Copies-To: never Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:68275 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: > David Engster writes: >> The error doesn't always happen. I usually have to repeat the >> procedure several times until it occurs. You can increase 'numlines' >> to make it more likely. It might also be that it depends on the load >> of the system or something like that. > > I tried 4 times (using emacs -Q) and always (!) got the error after some > seconds. System load is low. > GNU Emacs 23.0.90.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.14.7) > of 2009-02-10 on thinkpad > >> Maybe this >> >> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=471 >> >> might also be connected to this issue. > > Yes, at least it sounds quite similar. > > Should I report an emacs bug report for this or do you want to do it? Either way is fine. Could you also run a quick test with Emacs 22? If it doesn't happen there, one could try to find the commit which caused the regression, which would be very helpful information for a bug report. -David