From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11731 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: repost and message-ID Date: 19 Jul 1997 20:52:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151396 32159 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:03:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id NAA22353 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 13:28:03 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA23630 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 15:24:37 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 20:58:15 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 23004 invoked by uid 504); 19 Jul 1997 18:58:14 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 23001 invoked from network); 19 Jul 1997 18:58:13 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 19 Jul 1997 18:58:13 -0000 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex23.uio.no [129.240.154.43]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 20:58:10 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA18664; Sat, 19 Jul 1997 20:52:33 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 18 Jul 1997 14:27:34 +0200 Original-Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.1/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > What's the rationale for Gnus giving a new message-ID for reposted > articles, that has not otherwise changed? That's a good question. Hm, I don't see any reason why it should. If it essential that the Message-ID should be changed (for some reason or other), the user can do that manually. I've now changed the behavior. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen