From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9571
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: [Article display mess up] SOLVED! (-> FAQ ???)
Date: 23 Jan 1997 10:24:23 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2g1zs4ud4.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <yj9afq9591j.fsf@adobe.com> <m220bjkcba.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <qk2vi8ssphg.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <by915ln7h8.fsf_-_@math.ethz.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149575 19246 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:32:55 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:32:55 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from spork.callamer.com (root@spork.callamer.com [199.74.141.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA14232
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:10:45 -0800
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by spork.callamer.com (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id CAA02474 for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 02:04:48 -0800 (PST)
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex28.uio.no [129.240.154.48]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA21384@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 10:51:10 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id KAA04519; Thu, 23 Jan 1997 10:24:24 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of 22 Jan 1997 14:51:31 +0100
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.83/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9571
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9571

Jan Vroonhof <vroonhof@math.ethz.ch> writes:

> This annotation has a "begin-glyph" property set to the group
> icon/name. This wouldn't be a problem, BUT the gnus
> article-fancification code does not expect this and creates
> annotations/extents itself each one inheriting the begin-glyph
> property.

Is there a way to avoid inheriting this begin-glyph?  Could it be
marked as "non-inheritable" or something?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen