From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8995 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 26 Nov 1996 14:42:42 -0800 Sender: steve@altair.xemacs.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149087 15831 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 10256 invoked from smtpd); 26 Nov 1996 22:46:23 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 26 Nov 1996 22:46:22 -0000 Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 23:33:14 +0100 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.3/8.6.9) id OAA01798; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 14:42:42 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 26 Nov 1996 22:18:05 +0100 Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.69/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8995 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8995 >>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen writes: >>>>> "SJ" == Sudish Joseph writes: SJ> I've been seeing this since 0.60. It didn't happen prior to 0.56. SJ> In private mail with Lars, I convinced myself that Gnus was SJ> getting confused when the head article was cancelled. I'm no SJ> longer sure of this. I just had a 7 article group present 5 SJ> articles on entering. Per> Do you use dormant articles? I use many dormant articles, and have Per> had the problem of some unread articles missing from the summary more Per> often than not. Not usually, but I do use them in the group where I first noticed this problem. Per> Removing the dormant articles from the group info solved the problem, Per> so I suspect it is related to that. That didn't work for me. Is there anything else you did? I didn't notice it until quite recently, and in the group where I did first notice it, it gains one phantom message everytime I read the group with more than 1 unread message in it. :-( -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. "Bill Clinton is a bore. He doesn't have a creative bone in his body." -- David Brinkley