Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* seen mark
@ 2011-03-10  0:28 Richard Riley
  2011-03-10 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
  2011-03-10 17:34 ` Andreas Schwab
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Riley @ 2011-03-10  0:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: nognus


How can I remove the seen mark from an article (in testing I want spam
processing to be run on one article but thats already set as seen if not
unread)? gnus-summary-clear-mark-forward doesnt make it "unseen".




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: seen mark
  2011-03-10  0:28 seen mark Richard Riley
@ 2011-03-10 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
  2011-03-10 16:07   ` Richard Riley
  2011-03-10 17:34 ` Andreas Schwab
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2011-03-10 15:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:28:48 +0100 Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> wrote: 

RR> How can I remove the seen mark from an article (in testing I want spam
RR> processing to be run on one article but thats already set as seen if not
RR> unread)? gnus-summary-clear-mark-forward doesnt make it "unseen".

You can try `spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam'.  I don't know how to do
what you ask, though.

Ted




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: seen mark
  2011-03-10 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2011-03-10 16:07   ` Richard Riley
  2011-03-10 17:56     ` Ted Zlatanov
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Richard Riley @ 2011-03-10 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ted Zlatanov; +Cc: ding

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:28:48 +0100 Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> wrote: 
>
> RR> How can I remove the seen mark from an article (in testing I want spam
> RR> processing to be run on one article but thats already set as seen if not
> RR> unread)? gnus-summary-clear-mark-forward doesnt make it "unseen".
>
> You can try `spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam'.  I don't know how to do
> what you ask, though.

Hi Ted,

Thats why I wanted to clear the mark on a single article only. Changing
that variable sees my gnus lock up for an hour as it rechecks all unseen
for spam. Using spamassassin it approaches 7 seconds an article to
check!  Is that normal? (Debian).

-- 
☘ http://www.shamrockirishbar.com, http://splash-of-open-sauce.blogspot.com/ http://www.richardriley.net



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: seen mark
  2011-03-10  0:28 seen mark Richard Riley
  2011-03-10 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2011-03-10 17:34 ` Andreas Schwab
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Schwab @ 2011-03-10 17:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Richard Riley; +Cc: nognus

Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> writes:

> How can I remove the seen mark from an article (in testing I want spam
> processing to be run on one article but thats already set as seen if not
> unread)?

You can edit the group info with G E (gnus-group-edit-group).

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: seen mark
  2011-03-10 16:07   ` Richard Riley
@ 2011-03-10 17:56     ` Ted Zlatanov
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2011-03-10 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: ding

On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 17:07:59 +0100 Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> wrote: 

RR> Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:
>> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 01:28:48 +0100 Richard Riley <rileyrg@googlemail.com> wrote: 
>> 
RR> How can I remove the seen mark from an article (in testing I want spam
RR> processing to be run on one article but thats already set as seen if not
RR> unread)? gnus-summary-clear-mark-forward doesnt make it "unseen".
>> 
>> You can try `spam-mark-only-unseen-as-spam'.  I don't know how to do
>> what you ask, though.

RR> Thats why I wanted to clear the mark on a single article only. Changing
RR> that variable sees my gnus lock up for an hour as it rechecks all unseen
RR> for spam. Using spamassassin it approaches 7 seconds an article to
RR> check!  Is that normal? (Debian).

There is no way to do it currently unless you call the functions in
`spam-summary-prepare-exit' yourself.  I would copy the article to a
training group and do the slow processing there occasionally.  I plan to
work on spam2.el eventually, which will be much better about this.

Ted




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-03-10 17:56 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-03-10  0:28 seen mark Richard Riley
2011-03-10 15:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-10 16:07   ` Richard Riley
2011-03-10 17:56     ` Ted Zlatanov
2011-03-10 17:34 ` Andreas Schwab

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).