From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/76996 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: bug#8070: gnus damages attached file Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:27 +0100 Message-ID: References: <871v34nwdn.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87aahss3yu.fsf@gnus.org> <87hbbz6fg4.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87vd0fpvzv.fsf@gnus.org> <874o7z662d.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87d3mnk1sy.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87ipwfo6as.fsf@gnus.org> <87pqqndppl.fsf@myhost.localdomain> <87ei73dlvx.fsf@myhost.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298202052 10578 80.91.229.12 (20 Feb 2011 11:40:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bugs@gnus.org, ding@gnus.org To: Hobbit Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25329@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Feb 20 12:40:48 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr7eg-0004aK-Rf for ding-account@gmane.org; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr7eZ-0000wB-Dk; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:40:39 -0600 Original-Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr7eX-0000vt-PP for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:40:37 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr7eV-0005Ln-Mm for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 05:40:37 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Pr7eU-0001p3-8s; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:34 +0100 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0065E1C0F56F; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51B21C0013A; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:28 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AT60EVGBXrrV; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:28 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-109-210.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.109.210]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:27 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 93C8ECA2A0; Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:40:27 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: Yow! I'm UNEMPLOYED! In-Reply-To: <87ei73dlvx.fsf@myhost.localdomain> (Hobbit's message of "Sun, 20 Feb 2011 12:46:10 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.94 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: 0.4 (/) X-Spam-Report: SpamAssassin (3.3.1 2010-03-16) analysis follows Bayesian score: 0.0000 Ham tokens: 0.000-1504--4648h-0s--0d--H*UA:Emacs, 0.000-1392--4301h-0s--0d--H*u:Emacs, 0.000-1340--4140h-0s--0d--H*UA:Gnus, 0.000-1339--4139h-0s--0d--H*u:Gnus, 0.000-1291--3991h-0s--0d--H*u:linux Spam tokens: 0.998-303--3h-2978s--0d--H*Ad:U*bugs, 0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--hobbit, 0.987-1--0h-1s--0d--D*yandex.ru, 0.868-627--3132h-36690s--0d--HX-Spam-Relays-External:quimby.gnus.org, 0.868-627--3132h-36690s--0d--H*RU:quimby.gnus.org Autolearn status: no -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low trust [212.18.0.9 listed in list.dnswl.org] 2.3 FSL_RU_URL URI: FSL_RU_URL -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% [score: 0.0000] List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:76996 Archived-At: Hobbit writes: > Andreas Schwab writes: > >> It doesn't make sense to send a text without charset information, unless >> it is pure ASCII. Why would you want the recipient to guess wrong? > > Because almost all of my work recepients use Windows and expect only > CP1251. How is that an argument against specifying the correct charset explicitly? > So 98 % cases my recepients know what they are going to view. What about the remaining 2%? > Introducing some Gnus ability for other 2 % just create unnecesary > problems. Which problems? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."