* unix mail spool vs Exchange
@ 2003-10-09 18:37 K S V
2003-10-09 23:47 ` Steve Youngs
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: K S V @ 2003-10-09 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
In my company I have to justify why I need a unix mail spool
(there is a Exchange server already).
Is there any compelling reason other than procmail to use
unix mail spool
-ksv
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: unix mail spool vs Exchange
2003-10-09 18:37 unix mail spool vs Exchange K S V
@ 2003-10-09 23:47 ` Steve Youngs
2003-10-10 14:10 ` Kirk Strauser
2003-10-11 3:53 ` Amos Gouaux
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Steve Youngs @ 2003-10-09 23:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 553 bytes --]
|--==> "KSV" == K S V <K> writes:
KSV> In my company I have to justify why I need a unix mail spool
KSV> (there is a Exchange server already).
KSV> Is there any compelling reason other than procmail to use
KSV> unix mail spool
Isn't _not_ using exchange server reason enough? :-P
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| Ashes to ashes, dust to dust. |
| The proof of the pudding, is under the crust. |
|------------------------------<sryoungs@bigpond.net.au>---|
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 256 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: unix mail spool vs Exchange
2003-10-09 18:37 unix mail spool vs Exchange K S V
2003-10-09 23:47 ` Steve Youngs
@ 2003-10-10 14:10 ` Kirk Strauser
2003-10-11 3:53 ` Amos Gouaux
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Kirk Strauser @ 2003-10-10 14:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 208 bytes --]
At 2003-10-09T18:37:46Z, K S V <venky@netapp.com> writes:
> Is there any compelling reason other than procmail to use unix mail spool
Beats me. What are you wanting to do with it?
--
Kirk Strauser
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 188 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: unix mail spool vs Exchange
2003-10-09 18:37 unix mail spool vs Exchange K S V
2003-10-09 23:47 ` Steve Youngs
2003-10-10 14:10 ` Kirk Strauser
@ 2003-10-11 3:53 ` Amos Gouaux
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Amos Gouaux @ 2003-10-11 3:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
>>>>> On Fri, 10 Oct 2003 00:07:46 +0530,
>>>>> K S V <venky@netapp.com> (ksv) writes:
ksv> Hi,
ksv> In my company I have to justify why I need a unix mail spool
ksv> (there is a Exchange server already).
ksv> Is there any compelling reason other than procmail to use
ksv> unix mail spool
Tell them: how do they expect prospective UNIX customers to take
them seriously if they don't even use UNIX themselves....
--
Amos
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-10-11 3:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-10-09 18:37 unix mail spool vs Exchange K S V
2003-10-09 23:47 ` Steve Youngs
2003-10-10 14:10 ` Kirk Strauser
2003-10-11 3:53 ` Amos Gouaux
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).