From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10896
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: gnus date suggestion
Date: 08 May 1997 14:39:48 +0200
Message-ID: <m2hgge2l4b.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <x76812vhax.fsf@mastaler.com> <rvd8vah7id.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu> <x7sp078e8o.fsf@mastaler.com> <oqu3kmzxr7.fsf@icule.progiciels-bpi.ca> <x7d8r9jij2.fsf@mastaler.com> <oqafmcfvyw.fsf@icule.progiciels-bpi.ca> <kigbu6smvwc.fsf@jagor.srce.hr> <m2hggkqziw.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <whafmaju1x.fsf@heidrun.troll.no>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150694 27078 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:51:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:51:34 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id GAA24518
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Thu, 8 May 1997 06:10:49 -0700
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <OAA08830@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Thu, 8 May 1997 14:38:39 +0200
Original-Received: (qmail 11690 invoked by uid 504); 8 May 1997 12:36:26 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 11687 invoked from network); 8 May 1997 12:36:25 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 8 May 1997 12:36:25 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (larsi@ppp18.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.118]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <OAA08820@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@gnus.org> ; Thu, 8 May 1997 14:38:34 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id OAA02898; Thu, 8 May 1997 14:39:50 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Steinar Bang's message of 05 May 1997 08:45:46 +0200
Original-Lines: 12
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.51/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10896
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10896

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> > Indeed.  However, RFC1036 is currently being reformed, 
> 
> Is it?  Where?  What?  Something newer than son-of-rfc1036?  (I have
> some stuff I deeply disagree with in that one).

Write to usenet-format-request@clari.net to subscribe.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen