From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9661 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Catchup command request Date: 27 Jan 1997 12:57:04 -0800 Message-ID: References: <199701271948.UAA24913@ifi.uio.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149651 19749 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:34:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:34:11 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from riker.diamond-lane.net (root@riker [206.190.83.4]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA24637 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 13:18:48 -0800 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by riker.diamond-lane.net (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id NAA01950 for ; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 13:31:58 -0800 Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 21:46:05 +0100 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id MAA14090; Mon, 27 Jan 1997 12:57:04 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ X-Attribution: sb In-Reply-To: Karl Anderson's message of Mon, 27 Jan 1997 11:46:59 -0800 Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.5/XEmacs 20.0 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9661 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9661 Karl Anderson writes: > steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur) wrote: >> May I respectfully request that the c) atchup command in the *Summary* >> buffer use yes-or-no-p instead of y-or-n-p? > You could overload y-or-n-p with yes-or-no-p in your .emacs if you > don't mind using the latter all the time. I do mind, it's not the right solution. -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.