From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6127 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Suggestions Date: 03 May 1996 23:11:10 -0700 Sender: steve@miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.53) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146629 2649 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:43:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:43:49 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA05283 for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 02:33:47 -0700 Original-Received: from maud.ifi.uio.no (0@maud.ifi.uio.no [129.240.74.2]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sat, 4 May 1996 11:11:39 +0200 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@miranova.com [204.212.162.100]) by maud.ifi.uio.no ; Sat, 4 May 1996 08:10:59 +0200 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id XAA04767; Fri, 3 May 1996 23:11:11 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of 03 May 1996 19:02:28 -0700 Original-Lines: 27 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.80/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6127 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6127 >>>>> "Per" == Per Abrahamsen writes: Per> Actually, it is _t_e_x_t_/_e_n_r_i_c_h_e_d. Too many people confused richtext with Per> some half-hearted and poorly defined attempt at a portable word Per> processor format created by Microsoft with a similar name. Per> But I think it worked, at least metamail (_M_-_t) could decode the Per> message. The code for it in tm is richtext.el, and the MIME type it put on that message was: Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.53) Content-Type: text/richtext; charset=US-ASCII The copy I got was indeed enriched automatically by TM. Is text/enriched preferred then instead of text/richtext? My mailcap came with both defined identically, so I guess it could go either way. But if TM is using a suboptimal name, then now is the time to get it fixed. Regards, -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour. Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone except you in November.