From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, NICE_REPLY_C,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11504 invoked from network); 5 Aug 2021 06:05:33 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 5 Aug 2021 06:05:33 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVX-009Ijm-5Y for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:05:31 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVW-00DFvD-Jn for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:05:30 -0500 Received: from mx2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.33]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVU-00DFv5-Cp for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:05:28 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx2.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVS-00H1eM-BT for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 01:05:28 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Date:Subject: From:To:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=faw1RrxtQ4lVDvrWyN6DhbAWriXQtCVAFWFOBWJbi5o=; b=gxcFaAgcqwmtc7NowQKWzOTpyV e9wCgVmxNfAkg9t8lVSYepgsvIPlv2dXq9B4RKi6z0jB6ZNTz12wJv0mSoo3Ygu7Z04e8EzQp+dvS /8Yug6LeAjx4PpkVFRbpWYwn0jhk0qaK3Nj+iZOasus1ZeuC0pMpUlAjA7+rTMOZiRy8=; Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVK-0000Jj-Ms for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:05:20 +0200 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mBWVJ-0003f2-CE for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 05 Aug 2021 08:05:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: ding@gnus.org From: Pankaj Jangid Subject: Re: Difference between nnmail- and gnus- variables? Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2021 11:35:08 +0530 Message-ID: References: <87v94msauy.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87mtpys8uj.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <874kc55bwd.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:lxFr7HdB2uN0yQvft9KMpKrcuDY= List-ID: Precedence: bulk Eric Abrahamsen writes: > IMAP is a little odd just because it's kind of in between: the server > handles message storage, but the user "owns" the mail in the sense that > they're allowed to split, move, expire, etc. So some of the nnmail stuff > is relevant (splitting), but not most of it. A "real" nnmail backend is > one that ends up calling `nnmail-get-new-mail'. Thanks for the clarification.