From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/65310 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Is this patch of gnus/pop3.el reasonable? Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 00:01:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <85ir5r2302.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1191193337 24035 80.91.229.12 (30 Sep 2007 23:02:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:02:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 01 01:02:14 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ic7nh-0002yj-BY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 01 Oct 2007 01:02:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic7nd-00019P-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:09 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic7na-00018R-JV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic7nY-00016m-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:06 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic7nY-00016a-Ta for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2] helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ic7nY-0006EZ-8V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 19:02:04 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ic7nT-00070Y-3O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:01:59 +0000 Original-Received: from accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk ([193.60.92.141]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:01:59 +0000 Original-Received: from sdl.web by accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 23:01:59 +0000 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: accountslaptop.gradunion.cam.ac.uk Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAG1BMVEUAAAA9Cgm3Hx1WWFWA gn+WmJWsrqv4+vcCAwCRl2MkAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAAAAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAAJcEhZcwAAAYoA AAGKATOXMFgAAAAHdElNRQfXAQwDNR+ZJmElAAABIklEQVQoz22SPW+DQAyGWUq65qasd9PNUSX4 AZHK2C1rJy5jpDS4IwRVup9dn7GNafpKIPPgzztXFSujqq1eM2n8h22oMkvxI/i9C97kRfMRUN55 dS3BrsAwBXUtMLAO4lryh8kTjOxKpQNniNxAgZOEe4bZwsDTFhKdqZRLNII4OQNHhEuq/RMkm6Cj TnnEA/fk0BorcYn5qA3oaeAxbaBOLrX+9G48NZ2Fzc2tzDM8Q+tMypEOqYHh8mAWaaK3U/cDMOT5 aMZMABgPXc7zPMs1A8DXO756GFJ/4fMEq47hTsAdn5avoxZ4ywl0c2w4Flu2Ybeyb3S+EqxX2DYA H8veJGEDTnHnrXvRaPyt+2kSfK6rfBZ2tUtfP/mR+pR6sX8BUZ/cDV7tvkoAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 Emacs/23.0.50 (20070922) Fedora 7 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/R429Q3nDfRhvxxNRW9DxIuOWIY= X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:80067 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:65310 Archived-At: On 2007-09-30 23:38 +0100, David Kastrup wrote: > I am currently cleaning through unchecked changes in my Emacs tree. I > found that I have made the following change, presumably in order to > stop pop3 fetching from hanging in some cases with a possibly patchy > pop3 server. Could also be related to coding system translation or > something. > > Now the question is whether this is a bad idea to check into upstream. > I can't see that it will affect operation where the server is correct, > and it might avoid hangs where it isn't. > > What do you think? It might have something to do with: in emacs-devel. -- .: Leo :. [ sdl.web AT gmail.com ] .: [ GPG Key: 9283AA3F ] :. Use the most powerful email client -- http://gnus.org/