From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/37970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Janne Rinta-Manty Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: WIBNI there was a URL-syntax way of referring to the manual? Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2001 11:32:07 +0300 Sender: rintaman@cdr.offline Message-ID: References: <2nofpd9a43.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035173628 18329 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 04:13:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 04:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 28275 invoked from network); 18 Aug 2001 08:32:16 -0000 Original-Received: from porsta.cs.helsinki.fi (root@128.214.48.124) by gnus.org with SMTP; 18 Aug 2001 08:32:16 -0000 Original-Received: from cdr (barkentiini.in.helsinki.fi [128.214.189.38]) by porsta.cs.Helsinki.FI (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f7I8cGv18796 for ; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 11:38:17 +0300 Original-Received: by cdr via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 18 Aug 2001 11:32:08 +0300 (EEST) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: <2nofpd9a43.fsf@piglet.jia.vnet> (ShengHuo ZHU's message of "Fri, 17 Aug 2001 23:05:00 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090004 (Oort Gnus v0.04) Emacs/20.7 Original-Lines: 18 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37970 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:37970 ShengHuo ZHU 2001-08-18T06:05:00Z: ZSH> Karl Kleinpaste writes: >> That is, what if "info://Gnus/Select_Methods" pulled up the Gnus >> *Info* pages and picked off section "Select Methods"? And >> "info://Message/Mail_Variables" did the similar obvious thing? ZSH> Sounds cool. The hack is `+' -> SPC or "%20". Try ZSH> info://Gnus/Select%20Methods ZSH> info://Message/Mail+Variables Cool! But IMHO it would be better if it were info:/Foo/Bar, not with the double slash, conforming to the Generic URI syntax in RFC 2396. (And why not go all the way and register the info scheme (RFC 2717)...) -- Janne Rinta-Mänty