From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10530 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Gnus v5.4.40 is released Date: 04 Apr 1997 21:18:04 +0200 Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: <8cohbwcgcb.fsf@gadget.cscaper.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150385 24929 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:46:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:46:25 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id MAA05932 for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 12:19:42 -0800 Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 22:06:46 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 8806 invoked by uid 504); 4 Apr 1997 20:04:15 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 8803 invoked from network); 4 Apr 1997 20:04:14 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 1997 20:04:13 -0000 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp15.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.115]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 22:06:40 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id VAA12616; Fri, 4 Apr 1997 21:18:17 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Randal Schwartz's message of 03 Apr 1997 07:48:36 -0700 Original-Lines: 20 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.41/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I have noticed an intermittment error along those lines (perhaps). > Somewhere in the last 20 versions or so, I see in the summary perhaps > 15 messages in misc.tofu, so I enter the group and my scorefile > expunges a bunch of stuff (apparently it was all from that swedish > chef again who can't cook tofu worth beans!), and then I exit, but > there's still *15* messages in the summary buffer! The 15 messages > don't go away until I catchup in the summary buffer. Uhm... If you mean "group buffer" when you say "summary buffer" :-) I this sounds like you have an `expunge' score file rule without a `mark' score file rule. So the articles aren't shown, but they aren't marked as read either, which would lead to this kind of behavior. Is that the case? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) lmi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen