Re: Searchable (glimpsed) Mailing List archives?

[Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>]

>>>>> "Sten" == Sten Drescher <sten.drescher@tivoli.com> writes:

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes:
LMI> Still, it's less "public" in some ways, so I dunno about Alta
LMI> Vistaing it...  Should we take a poll?  Or rather, could those
LMI> people who are against indexing it make a noise?

Sten> 	Does AltaVista honor the X-No-Archive header like DejaNews
Sten> does?  Not that I'm really concerned about the ding list, but
Sten> some people may be.  And, since DejaNews does archive some
Sten> mailing lists (cypherpunks, in particular), it's prolly only a
Sten> matter of time before they find us.

They will `find us' almost instantly if I remove robotic blocking of
	http://www.miranova.com/gnus-list/

Since the messages are converted to html via hypernews, X-No-Archive
will only be effective if I catch it and throw out messages containing
it.  Should I be heeding X-No-Archive as well?

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.