From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32916
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: mail split with multiple backends
Date: 21 Oct 2000 04:09:42 -0700
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m2lmvimow9.fsf@pgnus-5.8.8-cvs.now.playing>
References: <m3zojzpalc.fsf@gorfajn.dyndns.org>
	<vafr95busax.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<87lmvjyyve.fsf@raven.localnet>
	<m2snprnhjb.fsf@pgnus-5.8.8-cvs.now.playing>
	<87hf66zts5.fsf@raven.localnet>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169118 22440 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:58:38 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:58:38 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C9AD0648
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 07:13:53 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAB08229;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 06:13:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 21 Oct 2000 06:12:59 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA02088
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 06:12:45 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mail.networkone.net (mail.networkone.net [209.144.112.75])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9EE1CD0648
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sat, 21 Oct 2000 07:13:10 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 18960 invoked from network); 21 Oct 2000 11:13:09 -0000
Original-Received: from adsl-116-86.ln.networkone.net (HELO reader.ptw.com) (209.144.116.86)
  by mail.networkone.net with SMTP; 21 Oct 2000 11:13:09 -0000
Original-Received: (from reader@localhost)
	by reader.ptw.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA24046;
	Sat, 21 Oct 2000 04:13:07 -0700
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Rob Browning's message of "20 Oct 2000 23:45:46 -0500"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.5
Original-Lines: 22
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32916
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32916

Rob Browning <rlb@cs.utexas.edu> writes:

> Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com> writes:
> 
> > Are you referring here to a respool across different backends?
> > 
> > Respooling from nnml to nnml the marks persist.
> 
> Has that changed recently?

I don't think so, but reviewing past changel logs will tell the story.
I respool one nnml group several times daily and see marks persist
into the destination groups.  I haven't tried every mark known to gnus
but `r', `!' and `?' persist.

Just now testing from a different backend, I see marks persist from
nndoc to nnml too.

> If not then I'm surprised, I sure did something a while back that lost
> my marks

Maybe you inadvertantly hit `M[eta]-c' from group buffer...