From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9002 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Danger! Danger! Date: 26 Nov 1996 15:57:30 -0800 Sender: steve@altair.xemacs.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.94) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149094 15906 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:54 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 10503 invoked from smtpd); 27 Nov 1996 00:10:46 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 00:10:45 -0000 Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 00:47:58 +0100 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.3/8.6.9) id PAA03087; Tue, 26 Nov 1996 15:57:31 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 26 Nov 1996 18:18:28 -0500 Original-Lines: 34 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.69/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9002 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9002 >>>>> "Sudish" == Sudish Joseph writes: Sudish> In article , Sudish> Steven L Baur writes: sb> Which is not a real solution as the problem appears in nnml groups. sb> It's scary to think of unread email that disappears in this fashion. Sudish> Hmm. The only time I've seen this happen in an nnml group was Sudish> when I had two matching rules for one group in an &'ed Sudish> nnmail-split-fancy -- it created two physical copies of the Sudish> message but displayed just one. ... Sudish> However, it *is* incorrect of Gnus not to let you know that it came Sudish> across a duplicate msgid (i assume this is what caused this particular Sudish> prob.). Yes. What I expect in that case is something like: Gnus-Warning: This is a duplication of message That is not what is happening to me. Lars identified one of my phantom messages and a grep confirms that it does not have a duplicate Message-ID. One bit of strangeness is that in Red Gnus v0.57, v0.69-v0.71 attempting to select this phantom unread message results in what looks like an infinite loop. When I tried the same thing with 5.2.40, I got a `cannot select' message. (The message is present on disk, and it is present in the .overview file). -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. "Bill Clinton is a bore. He doesn't have a creative bone in his body." -- David Brinkley