Re: Mail without `From:' lines

["Sudish Joseph" <sudish@VNET.IBM.COM>]

I gibbered:
> Anyways, the above paragraph was going to be changed to end on the
> lines of: "you're not supposed to reply to the contents of Sender,
> and Sender's a whole lot better for this purpose than the envelope
> recipient (as mailing list expanders are required to rewrite
> env. rec.); so I'd assume that replying _manually_ to env. recip. is
> strictly taboo."

Um, I meant envelope sender wherever I said envelope recipient, of
course.

Also, I think I'd prefer having a blank display to even Kai's
suggestion of using env. sender--IBM's vnet mail gateway rewrites it
to a source-routed form (advertising itself, of course) that is so
ugly to look at that a blank would be far better. :-)

-Sudish