Re: split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1361 bytes --]

/ Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> was heard to say:
| I have no idea how/why it traced <m23ar738ty.fsf@nwalsh.com> to nnml:misc.
| It isn't there, it wasn't sent from there, and it's never been there. Here
| are the headers for it:
[...]
| Curiously, if I look in .gnus.registry.eld, sure enough I find:
|
| ("<m23ar738ty.fsf@nwalsh.com>" ((mtime 18380 22548 203572)) "w3c.member.tag" "nnml:misc")
|
| So now I guess the question is, who decided to put nnml:misc in there?

And the answer to that question is, because this split rule didn't match:

  ("sender" "^tag-request@w3.org" "w3c.member.tag")

I took the "^" out, moved it down a little bit in the list, and now the
right thing happens. And I think this resolves the mystery of how *my
original* got misfiled. And that, in turn, resolves the mystery of why
the parents were wrong.

So it was user error after all. But we knew that already, right? :-)

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There has never been a perfect
http://nwalsh.com/            | government, because men have passions;
                              | and if they did not have passions,
                              | there would be no need for
                              | government.-- Voltaire

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 185 bytes --]