From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16518 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francisco Solsona Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnir search string Date: 31 Aug 1998 10:31:17 -0500 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155377 28321 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:09:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:09:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28723 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:38:09 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAF23631; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:09:06 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:36:26 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA10363 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:36:15 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from deprof.fciencias.unam.mx (solsona@deprof.fciencias.unam.mx [132.248.133.202]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA28703 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 11:35:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from solsona@localhost) by deprof.fciencias.unam.mx (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA32318; Mon, 31 Aug 1998 10:31:18 -0500 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: Harry Putnam In-Reply-To: Harry Putnam's message of "31 Aug 1998 01:06:16 -0700" X-Face: "e<&PCSuDeI>Wnz0s(fk:UP((Y'&0**fKwX:LL\,e"-5AS4+1|fdTE!(r,"&eLI}x(aQy-j M(jT(KvDbG@:bC<#KFDy}}*'Y8V7@DGOy39Ze@8P@tN)a%m/+'#Z?[+V&XUibbO writes: > This will probably get lost in Lars'uper human output. > > Can any kind of `regexp' or `boolean' formula be used at the nnir > prompt. The comments in nnir.el, say a 'string' is expected. But that > word always confuses me. It gets used to mean just about anything. > > It seems any attempt to use a regexp or boolean operator > like: cake\|cookies or cake;cookies > > (both are supported by "glimpse", the second one meaning `and' instead of `or') > results in a lenghty stall that never completes. > Is this just on my setup? Are others able to use regular expressions? Yup. I just go: `G G' and then `foo|bar' and it works. > Can any command flags be passed to `glimpse' from the `G G' command prompt? I haven't try it, but you should be able to say something like: `G G' `-YourOpcion YourParameters YourQuery' without any problem, the "query" is inserted as is. > What problems are encountered trying to impliment the use of the > `glimpse' -F flag? (can be used to restrict the search) I don't know what you mean, since the -F flag is used all the time to restrict your query to mail files only. Francisco -- If you want your spouse to listen and pay strict attention to every word you say, talk in your sleep.