From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/12580 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: future wishes - ACAP and LDAP support Date: 12 Oct 1997 15:50:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <19970930184007.48935@redwood.math.gatech.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035152090 4521 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:14:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA20878 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 09:09:45 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA15261 for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 11:02:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:13:20 +0200 Original-Received: (qmail 1525 invoked by uid 504); 12 Oct 1997 15:13:19 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 1521 invoked from network); 12 Oct 1997 15:13:18 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 12 Oct 1997 15:13:18 -0000 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (larsi@xyplex20.uio.no [129.240.154.40]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:13:16 +0200 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id RAA18365; Sun, 12 Oct 1997 17:14:26 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai Grossjohann's message of "05 Oct 1997 22:29:38 +0200" X-Mailer: Quassia Gnus v0.13/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Isn't there a form that uniquely identifies a group among all the > different servers (or select methods?) that exist? Stuff like > "nnfoo+baux:bar"? Couldn't that be used in nnmail-split-methods? And > would it make sense to have the nnmail-use-procmail stuff use the same > names? And default to the old server if the server spec isn't > present, as is true currently? One could do it that way, but I think it will be more handy to do it the other way. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen