From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10224
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: NT Emacs size
Date: 14 Mar 1997 20:45:23 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2n2s62r70.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <u913qaozf.fsf@ese-metz.fr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150131 23196 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:42:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:42:11 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA11265
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 14:13:29 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp18.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.118]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA07953@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 22:50:04 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA14629; Fri, 14 Mar 1997 20:45:24 +0100
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Fabrice POPINEAU's message of 14 Mar 1997 08:53:40 +0100
Original-Lines: 14
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.26/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10224
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10224

Fabrice POPINEAU <popineau@esemetz.ese-metz.fr> writes:

> I'm running a fresh started NTEmacs with gnus-5.4.25. The size of the
> process is over 27Mb: I'm wondering who is reponsible for this, and
> how I can trace it. I don't remember such high memory gobbling in the
> pas weeks. Is it really normal?

27Mb is quite a lot.  The only way to trace these things is keeping a
"top" process (or whatever you have under NT) going and see what makes
Emacs grow.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen