From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9280
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Why can a server not be edited?
Date: 07 Jan 1997 16:10:05 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2n2ul34j6.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <rf5sp5e3cra.fsf@vx.cit.alcatel.fr> <m2zpzlzzxz.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <tx1n2uqmhdn.fsf@cygnus.com> <m24tgwnylx.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no> <tx1wwtran5n.fsf@cygnus.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149327 17456 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:28:47 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:28:47 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id IAA32160 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 08:56:03 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp12.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.112]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <RAA24852@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 17:29:37 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id QAA04501; Tue, 7 Jan 1997 16:10:07 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Ken Raeburn's message of 05 Jan 1997 12:21:24 -0800
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.80/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9280
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9280

Ken Raeburn <raeburn@cygnus.com> writes:

> > Not necessarily -- only the virtual server name {sh,c}ould be listed
> > with each group from that server.
> 
> Is this because it's one of my select methods?  It is still supposed
> to happen for servers defined through the server buffer?

All groups that belong to servers have have names are supposed to
carry just the name of the server in the group info; not the complete
server definition.  There was a bug in this area before, but I think
it was fixed some time early on in Red Gnus.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen