From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8708 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: New feature request: "faked" identity, and supercede Date: 09 Nov 1996 22:45:59 -0800 Sender: steve@deanna.miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.93) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148837 13873 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:20:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:20:37 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 18780 invoked from smtpd); 10 Nov 1996 06:52:21 -0000 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2) by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 10 Nov 1996 06:52:20 -0000 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (qmailr@deanna.miranova.com [206.190.83.1]) by ifi.uio.no with SMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 10 Nov 1996 07:43:29 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 18665 invoked by uid 501); 10 Nov 1996 06:46:00 -0000 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of 09 Nov 1996 21:24:47 +0100 Original-Lines: 28 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.57/XEmacs 19.15 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8708 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8708 >>>>> "Hrv" == Hrvoje Niksic writes: Hrv> I don't think such obstacles are a good idea. Do you mean that Hrv> when I post from public.srce.hr with `From: Hrv> hniksic@fly.cc.fer.hr' (which *is* my valid internet address), Hrv> that I will be hampered? Or did I misread the messages? There isn't any sure-fire method of distinguishing spam from the email headers alone, so my guess is they intend you to be hampered. Cut it out guys. Security through obscurity doesn't work. Doing checks based on DNS isn't going to give you any protection, since there is no current way for Gnus & Emacs to check the validity of the DNS data it receives. (As one example consider a machine with a tunnelled connection to the internet, running a standalone root DNS server). Nearly all of the spam I receive is from stupid Microsoft Windows losers using Pegasus or Eudora anyway. Or consider public enemy CyberPromo and how they doctor their sendmail.cf to pretend to be from some other domain. Making Gnus harder to use for legitimate purposes isn't going to stop any of that. So why bother to pretend? -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message. What are the last two letters of "doesn't" and "can't"? Coincidence? I think not.