From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/59266 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jan Rychter Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Bug: spam articles not processed Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 13:26:13 -0800 Message-ID: References: <4n7jokbj24.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1101241743 15828 80.91.229.6 (23 Nov 2004 20:29:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 20:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M7806@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Nov 23 21:28:52 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13] ident=mail) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CWhHQ-00019r-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:28:52 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CWhG3-0003cF-00; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:27:27 -0600 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1CWhFv-0003c9-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:27:19 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1CWhFr-0007zO-ON for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:27:15 -0600 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE51E3A005D for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 14:27:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CWhFn-0006kP-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from 66-27-68-14.san.rr.com ([66.27.68.14]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:27:11 +0100 Original-Received: from jan by 66-27-68-14.san.rr.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2004 21:27:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 27 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 66-27-68-14.san.rr.com X-Spammers-Please: blackholeme@rychter.com User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) XEmacs/21.5 (chestnut, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:f/Fm9yUNMprfmhsITbk9csDZ6Ks= Precedence: bulk Original-Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59266 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:59266 >>>>> "Ted" == Ted Zlatanov writes: Ted> On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, jan@rychter.com wrote: >> It seems that articles marked as spam will not be processed upon >> group exit if I narrow the summary buffer in the meantime. >> >> To replicate: >> >> enter a summary buffer mark some spam articles narrow the summary >> (by doing for example "/ a") press "q" observe the spam articles >> just sitting there marked as read Ted> I am not familiar with limits, so would it work to call Ted> gnus-summary-pop-limit with universal-argument or is there a Ted> better way to do it? Ted, I'm sorry -- I'm afraid I won't be able to help you here. I was quite surprised that spam processing would be based on the final contents of the summary buffer at all. I'm assuming the above will work, or at least will do until we find a better solution. Thanks, --Jan