From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16478 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: SL Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.9 is released Date: 30 Aug 1998 16:23:41 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87soieqrmh.fsf@mharnois.workgroup.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155343 28029 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:09:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:09:03 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00829 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 19:27:54 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id RAF20259; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 17:57:37 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 30 Aug 1998 18:25:02 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA26399 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 18:24:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@altair.xemacs.org [206.190.83.19]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA00793 for ; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 19:24:49 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA19319; Sun, 30 Aug 1998 16:23:41 -0700 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: (:YAD@JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$ ,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3 Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l writes in ding@gnus.org: ... > Am I the only person the RFC2047 de/encoding works for? This message > has an X-Header-With-Japanese-Text header up there. Does it look OK > under MULE-enabled Emacsen, or is it totally garbled? Less garbled than only partially decoded. It looks like it's trying to be iso-2022-jp ...