From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9787
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus, movemail, POP3, trailing empty lines
Date: 04 Feb 1997 02:59:28 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2ohe1pbzz.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <199702032348.RAA157763@rs1.tcs.tulane.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149757 20545 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:35:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:35:57 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA11286
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 3 Feb 1997 19:02:27 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex15.uio.no [129.240.154.35]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA24149@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 03:53:37 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id CAA01771; Tue, 4 Feb 1997 02:59:34 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: "St. Suika Fenderson Roberts"'s message of Mon, 3 Feb 1997 17:48:37 -0600
Original-Lines: 19
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.11/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9787
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9787

"St. Suika Fenderson Roberts" <wrobert2@mailhost.tcs.tulane.edu> writes:

> On the subject, a while back I was playing with my .forward file, and
> found that gnus would properly handle mails split by `^From ...' instead
> of the more standard `\n\nFrom ...' (I found this out by munging things
> until I found a way to echo a bare `\n' onto the end of each mail :/ )
> 
> Has the code changed since?

Yes.  The Emacs regexp handler overflowed on the complex regexp used
to identify the "From " headers.  (And it didn't recognize some of
them.)

nnmail now uses a simpler (ie., more complicated) rule; involving
"\n\nFrom". 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen