From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9235
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: NoCeM flakiness in 0.74 and higher
Date: 17 Dec 1996 20:16:36 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2ohfthtgr.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <yvia20cpauh3.fsf@atreides.mindspring.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149290 17232 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:28:10 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:28:10 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
          by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id LAA28433 for <steve@miranova.com>; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 11:58:28 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp14.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.114]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <UAA00447@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 20:32:23 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id UAA06294; Tue, 17 Dec 1996 20:16:51 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Sudish Joseph's message of 17 Dec 1996 13:36:40 -0500
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.76/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9235
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9235

Sudish Joseph <sudish@mindspring.com> writes:

> It'd been running for a longish while before I killed it.  I wathced
> it start on news.lists.filters, said "yay, no more alt.nocem.misc",
> went for a smoke to give it time to scan the 250+ articles in n.l.f
> and came back to find it'd finished that and gone back to the a.n.m
> flakiness. 

Can't you just remove a.n.m from `gnus-nocem-groups'?

> In particular, it'd be neat if one could have an alist that let you
> specify the type of score entry you want generated for articles
> that're being eliminated by nocem.  A followup entry (I.e., low score
> on references) would be the most useful.

Yes, that would be useful.  It might be tricky to implement in an
efficient fashion, though.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen