* "mark thread read" without penalty?
@ 2012-02-05 16:15 Dave Abrahams
2012-02-05 16:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Dave Abrahams @ 2012-02-05 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
I often find myself wanting mark everything in a thread as read without having it get
scored down by adaptive scoring; I'm not trying to say "don't show me
future messages;" I just don't want to read the ones I've got. Is there
a way to do that?
Thanks!
--
Dave Abrahams
BoostPro Computing
http://www.boostpro.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread* Re: "mark thread read" without penalty?
2012-02-05 16:15 "mark thread read" without penalty? Dave Abrahams
@ 2012-02-05 16:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2012-02-05 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-06 23:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sivaram Neelakantan @ 2012-02-05 16:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Sun, Feb 05 2012,Dave Abrahams wrote:
> I often find myself wanting mark everything in a thread as read
> without having it get scored down by adaptive scoring; I'm not
> trying to say "don't show me future messages;" I just don't want to
> read the ones I've got. Is there a way to do that?
>
> Thanks!
err...not sure whether this is what you want or it achieves what you
want.
d runs the command gnus-summary-mark-as-read-forward, which is an
interactive compiled Lisp function in `gnus-sum.el'.
It is bound to d, M r, M d, <menu-bar> <Gnus> <Mark Read> <Mark as
read>.
(gnus-summary-mark-as-read-forward N)
Mark N articles as read forwards.
If N is negative, mark backwards instead.
The difference between N and the actual number of articles marked is
returned.
sivaram
--
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: "mark thread read" without penalty?
2012-02-05 16:15 "mark thread read" without penalty? Dave Abrahams
2012-02-05 16:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
@ 2012-02-05 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-06 23:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Ted Zlatanov @ 2012-02-05 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ding
On Sun, 05 Feb 2012 06:15:26 -1000 Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
DA> I often find myself wanting mark everything in a thread as read without having it get
DA> scored down by adaptive scoring; I'm not trying to say "don't show me
DA> future messages;" I just don't want to read the ones I've got. Is there
DA> a way to do that?
I think you want `gnus-summary-kill-thread'
Ted
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: "mark thread read" without penalty?
2012-02-05 16:15 "mark thread read" without penalty? Dave Abrahams
2012-02-05 16:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2012-02-05 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
@ 2012-02-06 23:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lars Ingebrigtsen @ 2012-02-06 23:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Abrahams; +Cc: ding
Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> writes:
> I often find myself wanting mark everything in a thread as read
> without having it get scored down by adaptive scoring; I'm not trying
> to say "don't show me future messages;" I just don't want to read the
> ones I've got. Is there a way to do that?
If you make the "K" mark now do any adaptive scoring, then I guess so.
If not, then there's probably nothing built in. I'd just write
something that marks the messages with a mark that doesn't have any
adaptive effect.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no * Sent from my Rome
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2012-02-06 23:50 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2012-02-05 16:15 "mark thread read" without penalty? Dave Abrahams
2012-02-05 16:49 ` Sivaram Neelakantan
2012-02-05 17:14 ` Ted Zlatanov
2012-02-06 23:50 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).