From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8918
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: The A A command takes forever to complete
Date: 23 Nov 1996 04:58:07 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2pw15v4xc.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no>
References: <rak9ret8az.fsf@epact.se> <rvg2227zof.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149024 15358 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:23:44 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:23:44 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 30137 invoked from smtpd); 23 Nov 1996 04:54:45 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 23 Nov 1996 04:54:45 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp11.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.111]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <FAA24350@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 05:31:38 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id EAA14904; Sat, 23 Nov 1996 04:58:13 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 22 Nov 1996 10:27:44 -0800
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.69/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8918
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8918

David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU> writes:

> 	The same bug occurs with 'Y c' in the summary buffer.  So I
> recommend never hitting 'Y c' unless you only have less than about 10
> cached articles.  It takes about 8 minutes to insert 145 cached articles
> into the summary buffer on my machine. ;)  So, it's usually faster just
> to hit 'C-u Z R'.

Yup.  Commands like `Y c' (and `^') rebuild threads, which means that
they have to do all kinds of things to work properly.  I'm sure they
do too much -- that part of the code is a wilderness I've yet to
tame. 

Perhaps `Y c' should just do a complete regeneration of the summary
buffer once if there's more than a couple of articles to be
inserted...  Either that, or we'll have to rewrite the general summary
buffer thread regeneration code.  Which might be a good idea.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen