From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8679
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Discussion: To del cached articles upon zapping group info?
Date: 09 Nov 1996 03:59:43 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2pw1o3rds.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no>
References: <qk2zq0sacyn.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch> <rvsp6khxs1.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148812 13689 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:20:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:20:12 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 5096 invoked from smtpd); 9 Nov 1996 03:08:28 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 9 Nov 1996 03:08:28 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.ifi.uio.no (larsi@ppp18.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.118]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA06603@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 03:59:52 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA18473; Sat, 9 Nov 1996 03:59:47 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 08 Nov 1996 17:17:50 -0800
Original-Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.57/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8679
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8679

David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU> writes:

> 	Well, it certainly shouldn't delete them, although you want it
> to stick them into some other archive kind of group.  You probably
> cached them because they had useful information.  But you obviously
> can't leave them in the cache tree, since they conflict with other
> messages.  You could probably roll your old articles into an archive,
> set the new real newsgroup to a highish level, and drop a virtual group
> on top of them to combine them.  Although this isn't a great solution.

Hm.  How about just moving the cached articles to, uhm,
"~/News/cache.old/group/name", or something like that?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen