Better interfacing with Mailcrypt

Better interfacing with Mailcrypt

[Senator Exon]

I like SGNUS checks, because they prevent me from doing stupid
mistakes such as forgetting to put a Subject: header. But when the To:
header contains "(*REMAILER*)", I'd like not to have this warning. Is
it possible ?

;;;
To reply to this message, take the following 28-line block, remove
leading "- " constructs (if any), and place it at the top of a
message to <haystack@holy.cow.net> :
::
Encrypted: PGP

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.2
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=teKG
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

Re: Better interfacing with Mailcrypt

[Steven L Baur]

::
Encrypted: PGP

-----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE-----
Version: 2.6.2
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=teKG
-----END PGP MESSAGE-----

>>>>> "anon" == Senator Exon <remailer@2005.bart.nl> writes:

anon> I like SGNUS checks, because they prevent me from doing stupid
anon> mistakes such as forgetting to put a Subject: header. But when the To:
anon> header contains "(*REMAILER*)", I'd like not to have this warning. Is
anon> it possible ?

Diddle with the value of message-syntax-check.  You will want to
remove the empty-headers check, probably in mc-remailer-encrypt-for-chain.


message-syntax-checks's value is nil
  -- a variable declared in Lisp.

Documentation:
Controls what syntax checks should not be performed on outgoing posts.
To disable checking of long signatures, for instance, add
 `(signature . disabled)' to this list.

Don't touch this variable unless you really know what you're doing.

Checks include subject-cmsg multiple-headers sendsys message-id from
long-lines control-chars size new-text redirected-followup signature
approved sender empty empty-headers message-id from subject.

P.S.
Considering that September Gnus will be out the door soon, now would
be an excellent time to make up your wish list for the next release.
Who needs PGP 3.0 when you have Gnus and Mailcrypt?
-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.