From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24019 invoked from network); 2 Jun 2021 23:45:08 -0000 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu (129.7.128.32) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 2 Jun 2021 23:45:08 -0000 Received: from lists1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.208]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1loaXq-00Bk9h-6S for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:45:06 -0500 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by lists1.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1loaXp-000Nr0-Ls for ml@inbox.vuxu.org; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:45:05 -0500 Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by lists1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1loaXn-000Nqs-EF for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:45:03 -0500 Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([95.216.78.240]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94) (envelope-from ) id 1loaXk-00Bk9P-Bg for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 02 Jun 2021 18:45:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hEhzpK7J1hpdm0kZ+kxWnTu+Z8x4sty8pv4G7g0ul2M=; b=TBsxX6pSXgKcgmzqX1pk/jkz7j iLmcGe6ofZLJUm5Dk1w667SoX597K1th6eWkck48x7ipRRRz1jaGJFBNhvExh8GSR4txr25YQnISx D4z0XTq2bREnUIMFfCN6jAkd9mWtlEgsMYePaGZWd26lR38YxIkzNcvREA7H2TuG8s+k=; Received: from www1564.sakura.ne.jp ([219.94.163.204]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1loaXZ-0003pT-LX for ding@gnus.org; Thu, 03 Jun 2021 01:44:55 +0200 Received: from cumulonimbus.local (39.200.49.163.rev.vmobile.jp [163.49.200.39]) (authenticated bits=0) by www1564.sakura.ne.jp (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 152NiQFs043222 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 3 Jun 2021 08:44:28 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hirotaka@hondalaw.com) From: Hirotaka Honda To: Eric Abrahamsen Cc: ding@gnus.org Subject: Re: (wrong-type-argument number-or-marker-p nil) error at gnus startup References: <87o8cwlia5.fsf@free.fr> <878s3yu6l3.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <977D30E3-06DB-46F7-BDC9-933E591A5E78@hondalaw.com> <87tumhsiw6.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> Date: Thu, 03 Jun 2021 08:44:26 +0900 In-Reply-To: (Hirotaka Honda's message of "Wed, 02 Jun 2021 17:40:19 +0900") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (darwin) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain List-ID: Precedence: bulk Dear all What a cool typo it was. Correct is: never happened again. Hirotaka Hirotaka Honda writes: > Dear all > > After I commented out gnus-registry as the following, any errors (or the > same errors) happened again. > > ;; (gnus-registry-initialize) > ;; (setq > ;; gnus-registry-split-strategy 'majority > ;; gnus-registry-ignored-groups '( > ;; ("nntp" t) > ;; ("nnrss" t) > ;; ("mail.spam" t) > ;; ("archive" t) > ;; ("Send-Mail" t)) > ;; gnus-registry-track-extra nil > ;; gnus-registry-max-entries 500000) > > ;; (setq spam-log-to-registry t) > > Hirotaka Honda > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> On 06/01/21 22:30 PM, Hirotaka Honda wrote: >>> Dear all >>> >>> I am not certian what is happening, though the most dubious mail has >>> the email header like this: >>> >>> X-From-Line: - Fri May 28 HH:MM:SS 2021 [I masked the time] >>> X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 >>> X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 >>> ... >>> From: =?iso-2022-jp?B?[mask]?= <[mask]@outlook.jp> >>> To: =?utf-8?B?[mask]?= >>> =?utf-8?B?[mask]?= <[mask]@[mask]> >>> Cc: =?iso-2022-jp?B?[mask]?= >>> =?iso-2022-jp?B?[mask]=?= <[mask]@[mask]>, >>> "[mask]@[mask]" <[mask]@[mask]> >>> ... >>> X-Mailer: JavaMail >>> >>> Does the Gnus expect that To field and Cc field are coded in different ways? >> >> That shouldn't be a problem, the decoding process is called once for >> each header, and each time it detects the coding over again. >> >> My only uncertainty is, should the headers somehow be already decoded at >> this point (during registry operation), and if so and we're just missing >> a decode call, why hasn't this become an issue in the past? I suspect we >> just need to add decoding to the process, but it still makes me suspicious.