From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/77188 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Erik Colson Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Version numbering Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:26:54 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87lj19m1g1.fsf@gnus.org> <87zkpom3nz.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> <877hcryxyl.fsf@gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1298456843 11390 80.91.229.12 (23 Feb 2011 10:27:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 10:27:23 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M25520@lists.math.uh.edu Wed Feb 23 11:27:19 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBwE-0006X6-Q8 for ding-account@gmane.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:27:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBw1-0001v4-00; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:27:05 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBvy-0001uZ-W5 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:27:02 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBvx-0000u2-AG for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 04:27:02 -0600 Original-Received: from 63.mail-out.ovh.net ([91.121.185.56]) by quimby.gnus.org with smtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PsBvv-0004Ne-Vm for ding@gnus.org; Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:27:00 +0100 Original-Received: (qmail 30139 invoked by uid 503); 23 Feb 2011 11:10:31 -0000 Original-Received: from b7.ovh.net (HELO mail181.ha.ovh.net) (213.186.33.57) by 63.mail-out.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 11:10:31 -0000 Original-Received: from b0.ovh.net (HELO queueout) (213.186.33.50) by b0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 12:26:57 +0200 Original-Received: from 213.219.166.172.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net (HELO localhost) (erik.colson@beavernet.be@213.219.166.172) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 23 Feb 2011 12:26:56 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Julien Danjou's message of "Wed, 23 Feb 2011 11:17:07 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110014 (No Gnus v0.14) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 16208455060210017110 X-Ovh-Remote: 213.219.166.172 (213.219.166.172.adsl.dyn.edpnet.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-Spam-Check: DONE|U 0.500003/N X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:77188 Archived-At: Julien Danjou writes: > On Wed, Feb 23 2011, Lars Ingebrigtsen wrote: > >> I have a feeling that this wouldn't really be all that useful for >> Gnus. > > But at least it would be correct. I slightly have the same idea about this... A 'release branch' which _only_ holds release commits will soon become a problem if one of the devs forgets this and pushes a non-release commit to the branch :/ Best -- erik colson ecocode.net