Re: Are the latest Oort features better suited for FSF Emacs?

[Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>]

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>
>> [ ... ]
>> 
>> Is this the case?  If so, what recent Gnus features work better under
>> FSF Emacs?
>> 
>> Or if this is not the case, what Gnus features work better under XEmacs?
>
> Perhaps it is only that Oort added support for things in Emacs that XEmacs
> has supported for a long time.  Images and stuff.
>
> The manual says Picons only works for XEmacs.  It also says XEmacs usually
> supports compface internally, Emacs only via external program.  It also
> says that XEmacs Gnus has a logo and toolbar while Emacs doesn't.  Other 
> than that, I can't find much differences in the manual.
>
> Personally, I find unicode works better with Oort in Emacs than in XEmacs.

Thanks.

Isn't there something involving network access or DNS or something like
that, which exists in FSF Emacs and which recent Oort's can make use of?
Or am I completely off base?

-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com