From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/44514
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lloyd Zusman <ljz@asfast.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Are the latest Oort features better suited for FSF Emacs?
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:55:03 -0400
Organization: FreeBSD/Linux Hippopotamus Preserve
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m2r8kxjnpk.fsf@asfast.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204301536010.31456-100000@yxa.extundo.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1020175019 15118 127.0.0.1 (30 Apr 2002 13:56:59 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 13:56:59 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 172Y7m-0003vj-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:56:58 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 172Y6U-0007u0-00; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:55:38 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:55:49 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA01768
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 08:55:36 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 15013 invoked by alias); 30 Apr 2002 13:55:18 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 15008 invoked from network); 30 Apr 2002 13:55:18 -0000
Original-Received: from home.acholado.net (216.27.138.216)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 30 Apr 2002 13:55:18 -0000
Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
  (uid 501)
  by home.acholado.net with local; Tue, 30 Apr 2002 09:55:03 -0400
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: "!ga1s|?LNLE3MeeeEYs(%LIl9q[xV9!<nimJxd1qyQRquvu5XTnZ:_5VE-G&4*EAuW"7oJLIXj'DWrJ0z@,FlwvD2PA@qhQ2R#zgsc14Klk;OSE'*;+l8p?0^nK7*X#0zg5wd^!M^2pg,M4Qd^{1viG;fa{}b.s[?g(x$45c]]=@'ZQ&]sPXl!u:hxBAv>j4#xf4!**BFW_ihlOb;:Slb>)vy>CJM<qjGM,/6C6\|{))YWm6}Q#?3om%n8
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0204301536010.31456-100000@yxa.extundo.com> (Simon
 Josefsson's message of "Tue, 30 Apr 2002 15:41:46 +0200 (CEST)")
Original-Lines: 30
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090006 (Oort Gnus v0.06) XEmacs/21.4 (Common Lisp,
 i686-pc-linux)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44514
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:44514

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Lloyd Zusman wrote:
>
>> [ ... ]
>> 
>> Is this the case?  If so, what recent Gnus features work better under
>> FSF Emacs?
>> 
>> Or if this is not the case, what Gnus features work better under XEmacs?
>
> Perhaps it is only that Oort added support for things in Emacs that XEmacs
> has supported for a long time.  Images and stuff.
>
> The manual says Picons only works for XEmacs.  It also says XEmacs usually
> supports compface internally, Emacs only via external program.  It also
> says that XEmacs Gnus has a logo and toolbar while Emacs doesn't.  Other 
> than that, I can't find much differences in the manual.
>
> Personally, I find unicode works better with Oort in Emacs than in XEmacs.

Thanks.

Isn't there something involving network access or DNS or something like
that, which exists in FSF Emacs and which recent Oort's can make use of?
Or am I completely off base?

-- 
 Lloyd Zusman
 ljz@asfast.com