What made ticked/unread articles becomes OLD ?!

What made ticked/unread articles becomes OLD ?!

[Danny Siu]

In my mail folder named "Active" (using nnfolder backend), after I do 'g' in
the summary buffer, all of the sudden all unread (no mark) and ticked ("!")
articles becomes old ("O") and hence hidden in the summary buffer!  C-u ret
in that reveals that articles that I ticked and articles with no marks has
been magically marked old.  This doesn't happen every time I get mail,
though, but it happens like once a month.  Does anyone know can this happen?
Is this a bug in Gnus?  I am using 5.4.42.

Here are variables related to the expire:

(setq nnmail-expiry-wait-function
      (function (lambda (group)
		  (cond ((string-match "Active" group) 21)
			((string-match "Other-Friends" group) 14)
			((string-match "Fvwm" group) 1)
			((string-match "MD" group) 1)
			(t nnmail-expiry-wait)))))

(setq gnus-auto-expirable-newsgroups "Active\\|Other-Friends\\|Fvwm\\|MD")

I am using all the default group parameters for "Active". (ie: total-expire
and expiry-wait are not set to any values)

Thanks!
-- 
                                                                ^..^
 '/..\"                                                        ( oo )  )~
m( oo )m                                                         ,,  ,,
/=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=\
|  Danny Dick-Fung Siu                http://www-leland.stanford.edu/~dsiu |
|  Reference System Group             http://www.csua.berkeley.edu/~dsiu   |
|  Adobe Systems Incorporated       E-Mail:<dsiu@alumni.eecs.berkeley.edu> |
|       "What do you expect from a         <dsiu@leland.stanford.edu>      |
|          Cal. Berkeley grad.?"           <dsiu@adobe.com>                |
\=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=/

Re: What made ticked/unread articles becomes OLD ?!

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Danny Siu <dsiu@Adobe.COM> writes:

> In my mail folder named "Active" (using nnfolder backend), after I do 'g' in
> the summary buffer,

You mean the group buffer?

> all of the sudden all unread (no mark) and ticked ("!")  articles
> becomes old ("O") and hence hidden in the summary buffer!  C-u ret
> in that reveals that articles that I ticked and articles with no
> marks has been magically marked old.  This doesn't happen every time
> I get mail, though, but it happens like once a month.  Does anyone
> know can this happen?

I've never had any reports of this happening with nnfolder groups, and
it sounds rather odd.  Hm.  Uhm.  Nope, I can't think of anything that
would make ticks be wiped out by `g'.  Are you sure that's the command
that does it?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen